Scientists Reject Creationism Because They Don’t Read Its “Scholarly” Literature, Says Creationist

Ken Ham has employed a cracker here. I, for one, Have read loads of supposedly pee reviewed technical creationist literature and remain totally unconvinced by it.

It is worth reading this article to see the futility of creationism

 

Source: Scientists Reject Creationism Because They Don’t Read Its “Scholarly” Literature, Says Creationist

ararat_or_bust

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Scientists Reject Creationism Because They Don’t Read Its “Scholarly” Literature, Says Creationist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s