Here Kevin gives the first of 6 blogs on why Geology says no to a Young Earth.
It’s worth reading just for the geology and photos
|This is the first in a planned six-part series of Six Geological Reasons Why I am Not a Young-Earth Creationist. I am a Christian who holds to the inerrancy and authority of the Bible, and who also has a master’s degree in geology. I have previously given my biblical and theological reasons why I believe the Bible does not require a young Earth. This present series will have six parts:
Each of these broad geological arguments against young-Earth creationism can be summarized as: Too many events, too little time.
Since the 1700s, most scientists, Christian or otherwise, who have studied the Earth have concluded that there is overwhelming evidence that Earth is many millions of years old. The evidence for an ancient Earth has come from many subdisciplines of geology, including the study of igneous…
View original post 2,022 more words
I fear this is beside the point. A single pebble is enough to show the Earth is ancient, if you think about what had to happen in order to make it. As with so many things, mere evidence isn’t enough to change minds. What would be?